Platform features

Audit scoring built for teams that already know SEO

ClaudeSkill SEO does not spend the report teaching basic SEO vocabulary. It scores the page and site, identifies the weighted categories dragging visibility down, and turns the findings into a severity-ranked fix plan for SEO, marketing, and engineering.

How the Health Score is measured

Each audit produces a 0-100 SEO Health Score from seven weighted categories. The weights prioritize the work most likely to affect rankings, mobile-first search performance, AI citation readiness, and trust signals.

Content Quality

23%

Depth, E-E-A-T, citations, author trust, thin pages, and whether the page can stand as the best result.

Technical SEO

22%

Crawlability, indexability, redirects, canonicals, robots, sitemap quality, status codes, and security headers.

On-Page SEO

20%

Search intent fit, titles, headings, internal links, semantic coverage, and page-template consistency.

Schema

10%

Valid JSON-LD, entity clarity, rich-result eligibility, and contradictions between visible copy and structured data.

Performance + CWV

10%

Mobile-first LCP, INP, CLS, PageSpeed evidence, and Search Console or CrUX field data where configured.

AI Search Readiness

10%

llms.txt, AI crawler access, citable passages, brand/entity signals, and AI platform visibility gaps.

Images

5%

Alt text, screenshots, report previews, dimensions, compression, author photos, and visual proof for users.

Severity tells the team what happens first

A 72/100 score is not enough. The report separates urgent ranking blockers from backlog improvements so the next sprint starts with the highest impact work.

Critical

24-48 hours

Indexing blockers, severe trust gaps, broken public claims, or issues likely to suppress visibility now.

High

Within 1 week

Problems with strong ranking or conversion impact: CWV regressions, canonical drift, thin priority pages, missing llms.txt.

Medium

Within 1 month

Optimization work that improves topical depth, internal linking, image coverage, schema completeness, or AI citability.

Low

Backlog

Nice-to-have improvements such as optional protocols, polish, and longer-term monitoring enhancements.

Google scoring is mobile-first

Google has used mobile-first indexing for years, so the audit treats mobile rendering, mobile UX, and Core Web Vitals as ranking-critical inputs. Performance checks focus on LCP, INP, and CLS instead of outdated FID language.

When Google APIs are configured, reports can include PageSpeed, Search Console, CrUX field data, index coverage, and organic performance context. Without those connections, the audit still inspects source, templates, rendering, and likely performance risks so teams know what to verify next.

AI search readiness includes llms.txt

AI visibility is no longer just FAQ copy. The audit checks whether AI crawlers can access the site, whether llms.txt exists, whether passages are long enough to cite, and whether brand/entity signals are strong enough for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Bing Copilot, and Google AI Overviews.

llms.txt gives AI systems a structured map of content, citation preferences, and brand context. It is not a ranking guarantee, but it helps search and AI teams make crawler access intentional instead of accidental.

What the report gives you

The report is designed to become a working backlog. SEO leads can defend priorities, marketers can see trust and citation gaps, and developers can inspect technical evidence before changing templates.

  • Overall SEO Health Score with weighted category contribution
  • Critical, High, Medium, and Low action plan with timelines
  • Technical findings such as redirects, canonicals, headers, crawlability, sitemap, and JavaScript rendering
  • Performance review for mobile-first Core Web Vitals including LCP, INP, and CLS
  • Schema inventory and validation findings for JSON-LD and entity coverage
  • GEO/AI readiness report covering llms.txt, AI crawler access, citable passages, and platform scores
  • Downloadable Markdown and JSON artifacts for tickets, client reports, and follow-up audits

Illustrative benchmark

Audit output usefulness

ClaudeSkill SEO
99
General audit suites
74
Rank trackers
63
Content optimizers
58
Crawler-only tools
52
Manual spreadsheets
31

Illustrative positioning graphic, not independently verified market benchmark data. It shows the product goal: scoring plus fix priority, not only crawling or rank tracking.

Built for follow-up, not one-off screenshots

Schedule repeat audits after launches, migrations, content updates, and template changes. The goal is to catch the issues that quietly suppress search visibility: a canonical changing from www to non-www, missing security headers, Core Web Vitals moving from good to needs improvement, a blog cluster becoming thin, or AI crawler guidance returning a 404. The report history gives teams a record of what changed and what still needs action.